President Obama is “Interested” in Tech Industry H-1B Abuses

There was an extraordinary exchange Monday evening on a Google+ “Hangout” between President Obama and a woman whose husband is an unemployed semiconductor engineer. She asked the President why H-1B visas are still being issued when there are many Americans like her husband –struggling to find permanent employment in the tech industry. President Obama’s answer perfectly illustrates why, to borrow one of his favorite terms, “our immigration system is broken.”

The President answers that “what industry tells me” is that there is a lack of skilled workers in the U.S., which is a little like saying, “the foxes tell me the henhouse is secure.” The reality is that the tech industry is bringing in tens of thousands of new long-term foreign guest workers every year (there are about 650,000 H-1B workers in the United States right now), who are displacing highly-skilled Americans. So instead of directing the government agencies responsible for administering the H-1B program to ensure that American workers are not adversely affected, the President is taking the word of the employers who are using H-1B workers to drive down wages and put Americans out of work. He finds the unemployed American engineer’s situation “interesting” and wants to find out what is happening.

But there is an even more telling statement made by President Obama that demonstrates a breathtaking ignorance of how the H-1B program operates. He believes it should only be used for companies who say they can not find qualified American workers. But employers are not required to do any such thing. The federal government allows employers to bring in H-1B guest workers even though there is an overabundance of skilled American workers available. Only “H-1B dependent” employers (more than 15% of their workforce) have to “attest” that they “attempted” to recruit a U.S. worker, and these attestations are virtually rubber stamped by the Department of Labor. Between 2000 and 2009, an astounding 94% of all H-1B applications were approved. When the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services agency (USCIS) examined a random sample of H-1B applications in 2008, it found that 21% contained violations, including 13% that were fraudulent. Obviously the federal government is not really concerned about whether or not the industry’s claims are true.

In 2007, then Senator Obama said this: “The intent is that H-1B visas only be issued if qualified American workers are unable to take the jobs in question….I fully agree that H-1B hires should be a last recourse as a matter of labor policy.” If that is his position then he now has the power to make sure that this becomes a matter of policy. The President says he wants to follow up on this issue. We will take him at his word and recommend he begins by reading FAIR’s report on the subject. He should also talk to Sens. Durbin and Grassley, who understand that the “H-1B visa program is plagued with fraud and abuse and is a vehicle for outsourcing American jobs.” They have drafted legislation that would require employers to actually demonstrate a need for foreign workers, and would close the loophole that allows employers to pay foreign workers below prevailing industry wage rates.

Tourist Visas Without Interviews: Playing with Fire

President Obama has already forgotten a key lesson inflicted on the nation by the 9-11 terrorists. The U.S. embassy in Saudi Arabia decided it would be more efficient and promote travel to the United States if it stopped requiring visa applicants to come to the consular section of the embassy for an in-person interview. As a result 13 of the 19 terrorists obtained their visas easily in that country even though in some instances the applications were not even complete. This program was termed “Visa Express.”

President Obama, in his January 19 speech at Disney World, outlined a program similar to Visa Express. He wants to reduce the visa interview requirement in countries where they are still required. While he mentioned the need to keep national security in mind, he called for a major increase in the number of visas issued by decreasing the number of interviews and speeding up the interviews that were still required. These recommendations are a throwback to a pre-9-11 mentality of giving priority to the number of visas issued while downplaying grounds of ineligibility – whether because of a threat to our security or a threat to U.S. jobs sought by foreign workers. This policy makes no sense in light of the 9-11 terrorist attacks and it is foolhardy as the Obama administration dismantles interior enforcement against illegal alien workers unless they commit a major crime.

Winning the Race to the Bottom

President Obama unsurprisingly devoted a good portion of his State of the Union address to “jobs.” But what he said was disheartening to Americans, unless you are an employer eager for access to cheap labor. The President has even stopped paying lip service to the importance of labor unions. For a president who has made corporate irresponsibility and income inequality the main focus of his reelection campaign, last night he sounded a lot like the President of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. (Take away the Chamber’s support for the Keystone Pipeline and Mr. Obama’s speech sounds eerily similar to the one delivered by the Chamber’s president.)

Here is what President Obama said: “It’s time to stop rewarding businesses that ship jobs overseas, and start rewarding companies that create jobs right here in America.” Nice rhetoric that on its own might give a glimmer of hope in a economic climate that, despite the administrations best efforts to put lipstick on a pig, Americans know all too well is not showing substantive improvement. But President Obama also wants Congress to pass “comprehensive immigration reform right now.” And, in order to satisfy the “many business leaders who want to hire in the United States but can’t find workers with the right skills,” President Obama wants to greatly expand guest worker programs. He even makes an argument that is patently false. He says that “growing industries in science and technology have twice as many openings as we have workers who can do the job.” As FAIR has pointed out, the National Science Foundation has found that there are at least 2½ times more tech workers than there are available jobs.

What President Obama proposes is to keep more jobs in the U.S. while bringing in more foreign workers to fill those jobs. That way, U.S. companies can depress wages enough in this country in order to remain competitive with countries where workers are ruthlessly exploited. Now I know that P.T. Barnum is purported to have said “there’s a sucker born every minute,” but does President Obama really think that Americans are going to believe that the best way to “put America back to work” is to allow U.S. employers to bring in millions more foreign workers? Can President Obama circumvent the law of supply and demand in the labor market as easily as he has bypassed U.S. immigration law? “[I]t’s getting more expensive to do business in places like China,” said President Obama. So, his solution is to make it less expensive to do business in American by depressing wages and lowering working conditions to in order to convince companies to locate their operations here. President Obama may not like Chinese tires, but he sure seems keen on their economic model.

DHS Must Explain Why it Released Convicted Felon

This week, the American people learned that a twice-convicted illegal alien felon from Haiti, Kesler Dufrene, went on a murder spree, killing three people in Florida. The murders occurred just two months after Dufrene finished his sentence and was released from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

ICE released him in spite of an immigration judge having previously ordered him to be removed from the country upon completing his sentence. He escaped deportation due to an order issued by President Obama ceasing all deportations to Haiti following the earthquake in 2010 (tens of thousands of Haitians living in the U.S. are currently protected by Temporary Protected Status (TPS) that was granted after the earthquake; however, Dufrene was not eligible for TPS because he was a convicted felon). Rather than accept responsibility, DHS is falsely claiming that their hands were tied by U.S. Supreme Court decisions that left them no choice but to put Dufrene back onto the streets of Florida.

The Supreme Court decisions DHS cited as its excuse for allowing Dufrene to remain in the country prevent indefinite detention of people whose deportation is not “reasonably foreseeable.” However, it is not the law that prevented Dufrene’s deportation, but rather DHS’s own decision not to deport anyone, including criminals, to Haiti. In other words, the only reason he could not be deported in a “reasonably foreseeable” timeframe is because DHS is choosing not deport anyone any time soon. Simply put, it was not the Supreme Court that allowed the release of this twice-convicted felon- it was the Administration’s policy choice.

DHS Retaliates Against Alabama; Suspends Roll-Out of Secure Communities

The following story appeared in FAIR’s January 23rd Legislative Update. To subscribe to FAIR’s Legislative Update click here.

Early in January, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) notified Alabama officials it had suspended the roll out of Secure Communities within the state. (The Birmingham News, Jan. 18, 2012)

The Secure Communities program, which uses fingerprinting technology to identify illegal aliens within local jails, is currently operational in 37 out of Alabama’s 67 counties. However, DHS had scheduled to complete the roll-out of Secure Communities to all counties in the state by the end of 2011. (CQ Today, Jan 17. 2012)

Remarkably, in an email sent to members of the Alabama Congressional Delegation, DHS essentially admits that the decision to suspend the program was done in retaliation against Alabama’s new immigration enforcement law, HB 56. The email from DHS states: “Although the federal courts have enjoined several parts of H.B. 56, certain provisions were not enjoined and are currently in effect…While these provisions of Alabama’s state immigration enforcement law, which conflict with ICE’s immigration enforcement policies and programs, remain the subject of litigation, ICE does not believe it is appropriate to expand deployment of Secure Communities…in Alabama.” (Aderholt press release, Jan. 17, 2012)

Meanwhile DHS told Alabama officials that the reason for the suspension of Secure Communities was cost. Spencer Collier, director of the Alabama State Department of Homeland Security, said that a DHS official assured him two weeks ago that the delay in Alabama was strictly for budget reasons. “She assured me that all 67 counties would be brought up to speed, but that it was taking longer and they were not going to make the December deadline,” Collier said. “She didn’t say anything about the immigration law…” (Id.)

Alabama’s representatives reacted strongly to DHS’s announcement. In a letter to DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano, Rep. Robert Aderholt, Chairman of the House Homeland Security Appropriations Subcommittee, urged DHS to complete the implementation of Secure Communities in Alabama. (Aderholt Letter to Napolitano, Jan. 17, 2012) He wrote: “The decision to delay deployment in Alabama, a state that enacted its own Immigration enforcement law due to concerns about the Federal government’s failure to enforce the law, is incomprehensible and gives additional evidence to those very concerns.” (Id.)

The Feds Had Better Stop Alabama…Before Everyone There Has a Job!

Oh no! It’s happened again. Alabama’s unemployment rate continues to plummet.

Ever since Alabama began implementing its immigration enforcement law, H.B. 56, in late September, the state’s unemployment rate has been dropping like a stone. In just the first month the law was in effect, unemployment in Alabama shrank from 9.8 percent of the workforce to 9.3 percent. And now the latest figures are in…and the news couldn’t be worse (for the Obama administration, the illegal alien lobby, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce that is): Alabama’s unemployment rate checked in at 8.1 percent in December. That’s more than a 17 percent reduction since September.

No wonder the Department of Justice sued Alabama and its Civil Rights division continues to harass state agencies, even though the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has agreed that all but a few provisions of the law could go into effect. Illegal aliens are responding to the law by leaving, which is not what the Obama administration or the illegal alien lobby want. And lots of jobs being vacated by illegal aliens are being filled by American workers, which is not exactly good news to cheap labor interests which have insisted that only illegal aliens would do those jobs.

Why the next thing you know, other states might get the idea that they too can reduce illegal immigration, tame unemployment, and cut costs by enacting similar policies. People might even start to wonder why the federal government isn’t doing it.