‘Moats,’ ‘Alligators,’ and the Politics of Border Security

Mexico’s drug cartels have been battling each other in a furious, violent, and bloody war that has been going on for the past decade. After a lull in the fighting during the late 1990s, the violence has steadily worsened since 2000.

The violence is at its worst right along Mexico’s northern border with the United States where drug cartels are at war in efforts to try to secure control to safe routes to the U.S. The increased level of violence and lawlessness even pressed our own State Department in recently declaring that parts of Mexico are not a safe travel destination for Americans.

While the many news stories of increased violence have been main topics of discussions among the media, the one story that came out of Mexico over the weekend should be most unsettling and disturbing to anyone valuing security of our nation. Forty-nine decapitated and mutilated bodies were found Sunday dumped on a highway connecting the northern Mexican metropolis of Monterrey (Mexico’s ninth largest city with over 1.1 million inhabitants) to the U.S. border in what appeared to be the latest blow in an escalating war of intimidation among drug gangs. (see AP story)

The Mexican government’s instability in its war against the drug cartels, especially so close to our southern border, is nothing short of a clear and present danger to the security of our nation.

President Obama and open borders advocates can poke fun at legislators and citizens’ groups who demand border security and enforcement of immigration laws, and DHS secretary Janet Napolitano can go on TV and claim that the border has never been so secure, but we know otherwise. The fact is that according to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) less than half of the 2,000 miles separating the U.S. and Mexico is “operationally controlled” by the Border Patrol, and only 129 miles are under “full control.”

It’s time to get serious about securing our borders before it’s too late.

Arguments Provide Insight as to How Supreme Court May Rule on SB 1070

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the Department of Justice’s lawsuit against the State of Arizona over its immigration law, SB 1070. During the arguments, the eight Justices (Justice Kagan recused herself) provided numerous observations and some of them deserve notice. FAIR’s Government Relations team put together a list of the top ten most interesting comments from the Justices and here is just a sneak preview:

CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS (TO SOLICITOR GENERAL): It seems to me that the Federal Government just doesn’t want to know who’s here illegally or not. (p. 50)

JUSTICE KENNEDY (TO SOLICITOR GENERAL): So you’re saying the government has a legitimate interest in not enforcing its laws? (p. 63)

For the full top ten list click here. The decision in this landmark case, expected sometime in June, will have a sizable impact on how immigration laws will be enforced in the United States in the future.

Latest Poll Shows Support for Arizona’s Immigration Law

Last Friday, the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute released results of its latest poll. The poll covered issues ranging from the U.S. economy to the performance of the Supreme Court on the heels of the recent Obamacare arguments.

Some of the more interesting results came from questions it posed about the issue of immigration. The questions were in reference to the upcoming Supreme Court hearing regarding Arizona’s SB 1070 law, the state’s immigration enforcement law. Overall, approval of the law increased from 61 percent in November 2011, to 68 percent in April 2012 – with 62 percent believing that the Supreme Court should uphold Arizona’s law.

However, the most striking result came from reaction among Hispanics where it found that 47 percent of Hispanics approve of Arizona’s immigration law, and that 45 percent (a plurality) want the new state’s law upheld by the Supreme Court (see questions 47 and 48 near the bottom of the poll).

While the mainstream media continues to ignore such results, the facts show that steps for increased immigration enforcement are popular among most of the U.S. Electorate, including Hispanic voters.

Video – Florida TV Station Exposes Voter Fraud

The NBC-affiliate in Fort Myers, Florida, recently discovered hundreds of cases in Florida of illegal aliens and non-US citizens of being registered and voting in past elections.

This expose’ provides a strong case in support of voter ID laws that are being pursued by a number of U.S. states leading up to November’s elections. The U.S. Department of Justice has recently blocked attempts by states like South Carolina and Texas to implement these laws.

Another Reason Why the DREAM Act is Really Bad Policy

Student protesters tried to storm a trustees meeting and were met with force by campus police. Many of the students were pepper-sprayed during the altercation. This was the scene that transpired last night at Santa Monica College where students demonstrated their anger towards the university’s plans to offer courses at four times the current cost by shouting “No cuts, no fees, education should be free.

When public universities are forced to raise tuition, outraged students, particularly in places like California, are letting many politicians and legislators off the hook.

Faced with an oncoming ‘bubble’ over loans and seeing valuable funding resources being directed to ‘bogus’ offices and departments, students should be asking tough questions of their representatives in their state capitols.

Even with tuition costs rising dramatically, Governor Brown and the California legislature passed and signed a DREAM Act in their state back in October of 2011. The California DREAM Act now provides in-state tuition rates and makes financial resources available to students who are in the state illegally. The money to cover the difference had to come from somewhere and the Governor and legislature figured that California students could, and should, bear the brunt of it. Governor Brown and politicians who supported the DREAM Act put illegal aliens ahead of the needs of its own citizens.

But California is not the only state that puts its taxpayers on the hook for subsidizing the post-secondary education of illegal alien. A number of other states (Illinois, Texas, Maryland, Washington, Wisconsin, just to name a few) allow illegal aliens access to in-state tuition rates, and a number of other states are considering this legislation. California, due to its large illegal alien population and its massive budget deficit (coincidence anyone?), is the first state to manifest the inevitable ill effects of this policy. The remainder of the states should pay particular close attention to what is happening in California.

Any student (or taxpayer for that matter) protesting out of control tuition rates in California and elsewhere should remember that as they write checks to their favorite institution of higher learning, but especially keep it in mind next time they enter the ballot box.

RI Gov. Chafee Shows Lack of Knowledge of Immigration Law

In an interview with NBC 10 in Providence, Rhode Island, Governor Lincoln Chafee said that he would veto any bill that would allow for the use of the federal E-Verify program as state lawmakers consider legislation aimed at preventing the hiring of illegal immigrants.

The Governor followed his statements up with a real head scratcher:

“We’re always going to pursue the law and make sure to the best of our ability that people are adhering to the standards and laws of our nation, our state and our community, but let’s not be divisive.”

Asked if he would veto any E-Verify legislation passed by the Rhode Island Legislature, Gov. Chafee, who reversed his predecessor’s executive order requiring E-Verify for state employees and state contractors, replied, “Yes, I’m consistent.”

Someone ought to mail the Governor a copy of the U.S. Code, specifically section 1325: Improper Entry by Alien. They may also want to include a dictionary, so he can look up “enforcement,” “divisive” and “consistent.”

You can watch the whole interview segment below.