Dems Debut Pelosi Amnesty Bill

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +

Amnesty DemotivatorWednesday, a group of House Democrats led by Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), introduced H.R. 15, a mass amnesty and guest worker bill based on the 1,000+ page Senate amnesty legislation, S. 744.

Democrats describe the legislation as the Senate Gang of Eight’s bill with alternative “border security” provisions. As put by Pelosi herself, H.R. 15 contains the “best of the Senate bill,” without the Corker-Hoeven “border surge” amendment, and with the McCaul-Jackson Lee border bill (H.R. 1417) in its place.  Which “border security” provisions the bill contains, however, is completely irrelevant given that: (1) neither actually takes any real steps to secure our nation’s borders, and (2) the bill still contains S. 744’s core amnesty-first, enforcement-later (probably never) approach. (See FAIR’s Comparison of H.R. 1417 and S.744)

H.R. 1417, sponsored by Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mike McCaul (R-Texas) and longtime amnesty advocate Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) does not require that the Department of Homeland Security actually obtain situational awareness or operational control of any part of the border; it merely requires DHS to submit a plan for doing so. Worst of all, the bill contains absolutely no enforcement mechanisms or penalties if the Department of Homeland Security fails to fulfill its responsibility to create and implement such plans. This, of course, leaves the American people with little hope that our borders will ever be secured, or that any sort of meaningful interior enforcement will be carried out under such legislation. If the Department and its predecessor had taken these responsibilities seriously in the first place, we wouldn’t be at such a crossroads.

Likewise, S. 744’s border security provisions (the so-called Corker-Hoeven amendment), while seemingly full of tough requirements to add thousands of more border agents and security measures, are no better. Really, Corker-Hoeven was nothing more than pork-laden provisions aimed at buying the votes of swing Senators. In reality, the “border security” provisions supplied by the Corker-Hoeven amendment can simply be waived by the Secretary of Homeland Security, again leaving the American people no safer under S. 744 than H.R. 1417.

But the farce doesn’t stop there. In addition to trying to fool the American people into believing that her bill will secure our nation’s borders, Minority Leader Pelosi also tried to convince the public that her legislation is “100 percent bipartisan.” However, not a single one of the 120 co-sponsors currently listed on the bill is a Republican.

Indeed, GOP leaders in the House have completely dismissed the legislation, saying they will not bring it to the floor for a vote. A spokesman for House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) said the legislation has a “zero percent” chance of making it to the floor.  And a House Judiciary Committee aide indicated that the chairman, Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), has no plans to even take it up in his committee, which has jurisdiction over the critical immigration issue.

Share.

About Author

avatar

Content written by former Federation for American Immigration Reform staff.

10 Comments

  1. avatar

    Yes she really need to retire…to all white American don’t ever vote her again in the next election. I used to worked with the guest workers H2b visa 3 years ago there claiming 4-6 children in there taxes jus to get big money refund. FRAUD!!

  2. avatar

    This is not a good bill at all since it appears to strip the stronger border security provisions. The border must be be secure first as a condition to any changes in immigration law.

  3. avatar

    Pelosi—we do not want your amnesty for illegals. WE WANT BORDER CONTROL FIRST, THEN MAYBE WE WILL THINK ABOUT LETTING MORE LEGAL MEXICANS IN. I THINK IT IS TIME FOR YOU TO RETIRE.

  4. avatar

    why can’t the Republicans agree on passing amnesty? Since it’s going to benefit the ecomony and republicans in the future vote.This will also benefit the goverment and less crime. People will be able to work and generate more for the benefit of both sides.

    • avatar

      Latinos are never going to vote Republican because they like the expensive social programs the Democrats deliver to them.

  5. Pingback: Dems Debut Pelosi Amnesty Bill | Truckers